Tag: hears

  • Federal judge hears Labor Department’s renewed request to block DOGE access

    Federal judge hears Labor Department’s renewed request to block DOGE access

    A federal judge on Friday indefinitely delayed a final ruling on the Labor Department’s request to block Elon Musk’s government efficiency team from accessing internal system data, telling both parties only that “you will hear from me,” while declining to promise an exact time or date. 

    The update from U.S. District Judge John Bates, a George W. Bush appointee, comes just one week after he rejected an earlier attempt from the Labor Department to issue a temporary restraining order to block DOGE access to internal system data, saying that the plaintiffs lacked standing, and failed to show they would suffer sufficient harm as a result of the actions. 

    In response, unions amended their complaint to broaden the scope of the lawsuit, adding the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Education, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. 

    LAWSUIT TRACKER: NEW RESISTANCE BATTLING TRUMP’S SECOND TERM THROUGH ONSLAUGHT OF LAWSUITS TAKING AIM AT EOS

    Protesters demonstrate in support of federal workers outside of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on February 14, 2025 in Washington, DC.  Organizers held the protest to speak on the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) cuts. ( (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images))

    Arguments on Friday stretched for more than three hours, with plaintiffs arguing that DOGE employees were accessing their information illegally, since DOGE is not technically a U.S. government agency.

    “There has been reporting that DOGE is directing the cuts of agency staff and contracts, not simply advising the president,” one lawyer for the plaintiffs told Judge Bates, “The situation is extremely fluid and changing,” plaintiffs argued.

    They urged Judge Bates to grant a temporary request to block DOGE’s access to the information, which they said would “force the agency to implement a more thoughtful process.”

    Meanwhile, the Justice Department argued in response that the DOGE personnel in question are “detailed” U.S. government employees, who have access to the information under provisions of the Economy Act.

    Judge Bates declined to rule from the bench, telling both sides only that “You will hear from me.”

    The update will likely do little in the near-term to assuage concerns at the Labor Department and other federal agencies over DOGE’s access to sensitive internal data. 

    Attorneys for Labor Department unions argued during last week’s hearing that, absent court intervention, DOGE could access protected agency information, including the financial and medical records of millions of Americans, and employee safety and workplace complaints.

    Plaintiffs noted that Labor Department systems contain sensitive information about investigations into Musk-owned companies Tesla and SpaceX, as well as information about trade secrets of competing companies, plaintiffs noted— sparking concerns about Elon Musk’s possible access.

    Attorney Mark Samburg argued that DOGE access to this information could have a “chilling effect” on new employees coming forward, due to fear of unlawful disclosure or retaliation.  

    “The sensitive information of millions of people is currently at imminent risk of unlawful disclosure,” Samburg said.

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

    Judge Bates suggested Friday that DOGE’s creation and its hierarchy were “odd,” noting that it “was created in a way to get it out of OMB [Office of Management and Budget], and instead answering to the chief of staff of the president.”

    DOGE “took great effort to avoid being an agency, but in this case, you’re an agency,” he said of DOGE. “It just seems to strain credulity.” 

    This is a breaking news story. Check back shortly for updates. 

  • Taylor Swift hears loud boos at Super Bowl LIX after Trump gets raucous cheer

    Taylor Swift hears loud boos at Super Bowl LIX after Trump gets raucous cheer

    Taylor Swift isn’t on her “Eras Tour” anymore. 

    The pop star showed up to Super Bowl LIX in New Orleans on Sunday, and the fans there gave her a loud chorus of boos when she was shown on the Caesars Superdome jumbotron. 

    SIGN UP FOR TUBI AND STREAM SUPER BOWL LIX FOR FREE

    Swift didn’t look as if she was too familiar or comfortable being booed by a large crowd as her expression turned to visibly nervous confusion once the chorus began. 

    Swift is attending her second Super Bowl after showing up at last year’s big game in Las Vegas to cheer on her boyfriend and Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce. Many NFL fans have come to be critical of the constant displaying of Swift during broadcasts and on jumbotrons dating back to last season. 

    Her booing by the crowd also coincided with a heavy barrage of boos that welcomed the Chiefs as a team when they ran through the tunnel prior to the game. 

    CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

    Taylor Swift, actress Blake Lively, rapper Ice Spice and singer-songwriter Lana Del Rey react during Super Bowl LVIII, February 11, 2024. (PATRICK T. FALLON/AFP via Getty Images)

    Swift, as Kelce’s girlfriend, has quickly become an iconic figure within the Chiefs franchise. But Swift’s football roots are with the Eagles, as she grew up an Eagles fan in Pennsylvania. 

    Swift and her father abandoned this fandom when she started dating Kelce last season, so the crowd treated her accordingly in New Orleans. 

    And before Swift was booed relentlessly by the Superdome crowd, that same crowd gave a raucous cheer to President Donald Trump when he was shown on screen prior to the game. 

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    Donald Trump/Taylor Swift

    Donald Trump and Taylor Swift were both at Super Bowl LIX. (Getty Images)

    Trump was standing in between New Orleans Saints owner Gayle Benson and Trump’s daughter, Ivanka, during the national anthem, which also received a loud roar from the crowd before kickoff.

    Swift infamously endorsed former Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 election on Sept. 10. Days after Swift announced her endorsement, Trump sent a post on Truth Social that read “I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT!” 

    The crowd in the Superdome on Sunday seems to be more aligned with Trump on that argument.

    Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

  • Senate banking panel hears debanking testimony: ‘extremely disruptive’

    Senate banking panel hears debanking testimony: ‘extremely disruptive’

    The Senate Banking Committee on Wednesday held a hearing on debanking in the financial services industry amid challenges facing businesses in the crypto and cannabis industries as well as politically motivated debanking of other customers.

    Federal laws and financial regulations require institutions in the banking industry to close accounts over concerns about things like money laundering or illicit financial activities and concerns over reputational risk. 

    Uncertainty surrounding emerging industries that have unclear regulatory frameworks, such as digital assets like crypto or cannabis businesses in states with legal marijuana, have contributed to debanking, while regulatory guidelines have also resulted in firearm makers and dealers being debanked.

    Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle raised concerns about debanking and argued that there should be more regulatory clarity to prevent such incidents from happening without explanation.

    TRUMP’S DAVOS COMMENTS REIGNITE DEBANKING CONTROVERSY

    Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott, R-S.C., said he wants a bipartisan solution to debanking issues. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

    Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott, R-S.C., said that it’s “incredibly alarming and disheartening to hear stories about financial institutions cutting off services to digital asset firms, political figures and conservative-aligned businesses and individuals.”

    “This issue should concern every single American, regardless of political affiliation, and that’s why I’m committed to a bipartisan solution to stop this form of discrimination,” Scott added. “The message is crystal clear: No regulator and no bank is above the principles of fairness and market access.”

    Senate Banking Committee ranking member Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., noted that debanking at one institution can cause a chain reaction that leaves the customer unable to access financial services at other institutions.

    “Once the bank shuts someone out, the bank may share that information with companies that get paid to maintain a ‘do not bank’ list with the result that the customer is blacklisted everywhere,” Warren said. “People shouldn’t be arbitrarily denied access to their banks, locked out of their accounts or stripped of their banking privileges.”

    TRUMP CONFRONTS BANK OF AMERICA CEO FOR NOT TAKING ‘CONSERVATIVE BUSINESS’

    Warren said her staff identified 11,955 complaints from customers who were debanked in the past three years, with many reporting they received no warning or explanation and didn’t have an opportunity to dispute or appeal the decisions. 

    She said four banks – JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo and Citi – account for half of all debanking complaints. Those are the four largest commercial banks in the U.S., according to Federal Reserve data.

    Senator Elizabeth Warren

    Tim Scott, R-S.C., chair of the Senate Banking Committee, and ranking member Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., are shown during a hearing on the impact of debanking in the United States on Feb. 5, 2025. (Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    The committee heard testimony from four witnesses: Nathan McCauley, CEO and co-founder of Anchorage Digital; Stephen Gannon, partner at Davis Wright Tremaine LLP; Mike Ring, CEO and co-founder of Old Glory Bank; and Aaron Klein, senior fellow in economic studies at the Brookings Institution.

    HOUSE OVERSIGHT CHAIR: BANKS WILL FACE ‘A LOT OF QUESTIONS’ OVER ALLEGED DEBANKING OF CONSERVATIVES

    McCauley, whose firm is a crypto bank that received a federal charter in 2021, said that in 2023 a partner bank where the firm held corporate accounts for two and a half years told them they would close their accounts in 30 days. The reason given was because the bank was uncomfortable with crypto clients, and the decision was made without offering Anchorage an opportunity to talk to the bank’s risk management team.

    “Why did this happen? I believe that regulators pressured banks to shut an entire industry out of the federal banking system,” McCauley said. He added that while Anchorage eventually found a new home for the bank, the “impact of nearly being shut out of the banking system was devastating.”

    “It was extremely disruptive to our business and our clients and contributed to the very difficult decision to lay off 70 employees here in the United States, about 20% of our staff. To this day, our clients lack the ability to send wire transfers to third parties,” he added. “The irony of having trouble accessing the federal bank system, despite the fact that we ourselves are a federally chartered bank, cannot be overstated.”

    JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon

    JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon recently called for financial institutions to have more clarity about what they need to do and can’t do in debanking situations. (Victor J. Blue/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    Klein explained during the hearing that while reputational risks and the preservation of consumer trust is vital for banks, there may be a need for safeguards to prevent them being abused and used as a reason to end client relationships. 

    “Trust is the cornerstone of all banks,” Klein said. “Consumers trust that the banks have their money, and when a bank loses trust, it has the possibility to have a run on it. So the need to consider reputational risk is real and it is important. It is possible that it is abused, and you need to have guardrails on it. But it is absolutely a certain and important part of bank regulation and supervision.”

    GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

    Debanking incidents have prompted accusations that financial institutions are cutting certain clients loose for political or ideological reasons. 

    Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase have denied that politics contributed to debanking decisions. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon recently said there should be better guidance for banks about how to handle such situations.

    “I think we should be allowed to tell you. … When we report stuff, the federal government should probably know about it, and there should be far cleaner lines about what we have to do and what we don’t have to do,” Dimon said in January on the bank’s “The Unshakeables” podcast. “We’ve been complaining about this for years. We need to fix it.”