Tag: competing

  • Competing rulings on under 21 handgun sales could put issue before Supreme Court

    Competing rulings on under 21 handgun sales could put issue before Supreme Court

    The Supreme Court may soon weigh in on whether people younger than 21 have the right to buy handguns, a decision that could upend decades-old federal restrictions and reshape the nation’s gun laws.

    In January, the right-leaning Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, based in New Orleans, struck down the federal government’s decades-old ban on handgun purchases for 18- to 20-year-olds. That decision came after the 10th Circuit upheld the same prohibition in November. Meanwhile, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is currently considering whether to uphold a Virginia district court judge’s decision ending the age-limit ban.

    “Whenever there’s decisions that cross each other, you have a much better chance of getting a writ of certiorari at the U.S. Supreme Court,” Alan Gottlieb, founder of the Second Amendment Foundation, told Fox News Digital. 

    FEDERAL COURT RULES AGE LIMITS ON HANDGUN SALES VIOLATE SECOND AMENDMENT

    “This issue is definitely making its way to the Supreme Court—and fast,” said Pepperdine’s Jacob Charles, a constitutional law professor with an expertise in Second Amendment issues. “This is a key federal law, and you just can’t have that apply differently across the nation (at least for long).”

    The federal ban on handgun sales to people younger than 21 began in 1968 as part of the Gun Control Act passed that year.

    The federal ban on handgun sales to people under the age of 21 began in 1968 as part of the Gun Control Act passed that year. Fast-forward to the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, and a tranche of lawsuits aiming to upend laws restricting gun sales to people over 21 are making their way through the courts. The gun-violence nonprofit news outlet The Trace compiled data showing that between June 2022 and August 2024, there have been more than 1,600 Bruen-based challenges to gun laws.

    The Bruen decision rejected the strict scrutiny frameworks being used by lower courts to evaluate gun laws and instead established a “historical tradition” that required laws to adhere more directly to the text of the Second Amendment.

    “The levels of scrutiny – rational basis, intermediate scrutiny, strict scrutiny – don’t matter. What the Supreme Court’s Bruen ruling said was, you have to look at the text and the history. That’s what counts,” said Gottlieb. “When the Bill of Rights was put together, there was nothing that prohibited 18-to 20-year-old young adults from being able to own or carry a firearm.” 

    Guns at NRA

    Handguns are displayed at the Taurus booth during the National Rifle Association annual convention in Indianapolis. (Photographer: Jon Cherry/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    Gottlieb and the Second Amendment Foundation have sued in several states to reverse their bans on hand gun sales to young adults under 21. 

    Several cases challenging age limit bans, including cases filed in Massachusetts and Connecticut this month, are ongoing. 

    KYLE RITTENHOUSE RETURNS TO SPEAK AT UNIVERSITY WHERE ANGRY MOB LED TO CANCELED SPEECH

    “Our track record, at least, is mostly wins, and part of the logic on that is that there’s nothing in under the Bruen decision at the Supreme Court, which makes them look at the text and history of the Second Amendment.” 

    Gun control protestor outside the Supreme Court

    A protester holds signs calling for an end to gun violence in front of the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. (Nathan Howard/Getty Images)

    The Fifth Circuit decision cited the Supreme Court’s Bruen ruling in its decision not to uphold the federal ban, as did two other circuit courts over the last year. 

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    One case in the Eighth Circuit invalidated a ban in Minnesota. Since then, the Commissioner of Public Safety in Minnesota filed a petition for the Supreme Court to rule on the case. That petition is currently pending.

  • Trans athlete Sadie Schreiner not competing for RIT women’s track team after Trump’s executive order

    Trans athlete Sadie Schreiner not competing for RIT women’s track team after Trump’s executive order

    Transgender track and field runner Sadie Schreiner is not competing in future events for Rochester Institute of Technology’s (RIT) women’s track and field team amid the NCAA changing its gender eligibility policy. 

    An RIT spokesperson told Fox News Digital that the program is complying with the NCAA’s new policy that reflects President Donald Trump’s recent executive order that bans trans athletes from women’s sports. 

    “We continue to follow the NCAA participation policy for transgender student-athletes following the Trump administration’s executive order. Sadie is not participating in the next meet,” the spokesperson said. 

    CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

    Sadie Schreiner puts a transgender flag in her hair before heading to the awards stand at the NCAA DIII outdoor track and field championships on May 25, 2024, in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. (Jahi Chikwendiu/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

    The NCAA officially changed its gender eligibility policies to ban all biological males from women’s sports on Feb. 6, one day after Trump signed the order.

    “A student-athlete assigned male at birth may not compete on a women’s team,” the new policy reads. 

    However, the policy also states that a biological male can still practice on a women’s team and “receive benefits.”

    “A student-athlete assigned male at birth may practice on an NCAA women’s team and receive all other benefits applicable to student-athletes,” the policy reads. 

    RIT has not confirmed to Fox News Digital whether Schreiner has been removed from the roster and is no longer practicing with the team. Schreiner still has a player profile page on the team’s official website. 

    Schreiner has been a controversial figure in women’s track and field this year after an appearance at the 2024 NCAA Division III Outdoor Track & Field Championship in May. 

    There, Schreiner finished last in the 400 meter, but still occupied a spot in the competition that could have gone to a biological female. 

    TEEN GIRLS OPEN UP ON TRANS ATHLETE SCANDAL THAT TURNED THEIR HIGH SCHOOL INTO A CULTURE WAR BATTLEGROUND 

    Earlier that month, Schreiner competed at the Liberty League Championship, and won both the women’s 200- and 400-meter, breaking the 400-meter record in the process. Schreiner would have finished last by more than two seconds if the athlete put up the same performance in the men’s competition.

    Recently, in late January, Schreiner bragged after winning an event against female opponents. 

    “Not the race I was looking for at all this week, my spikes nearly fell off on the turn and with a poor start my time wasn’t nearly what I wanted,” the RIT runner wrote in an Instagram post.

    “The good news is that the season just started, and I’m going to leave everything on the track at nationals,” Schreiner added with a transgender pride flag emoji.

    Schreiner also made it a point to speak out against states and colleges that were not offering the trans athlete a full scholarship when Schreiner wanted to transfer, in December. The athlete blamed laws in 25 states that prohibit trans athletes from competing with girls and women. 

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    Sadie Schreiner in the 400

    Sadie Schreiner races to qualify in the 400m race at the NCAA DIII outdoor track and field championships on May 24, 2024, in Myrtle Beach. (Jahi Chikwendiu/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

    “Among all the hurdles transfers usually have, there is an extra layer because it is trans, 50% of the country banned me from participating and that meant I couldn’t attend any of those colleges even if they reached out to me with a full ride,” Schreiner said.

    “It also became clear that states that did, no matter how adamant the coaches were to have me on their teams, the college administrations would usually stop them from allowing me to participate.” 

    Now, Schreiner likely won’t be able to compete on any women’s college teams throughout the country with the NCAA’s new policy in place.

    However, Schreiner would be able to compete on a men’s team, per the new policy.

    “Regardless of sex assigned at birth or gender identity, a student-athlete may participate (practice and competition) in NCAA men’s sports, assuming they meet all other NCAA eligibility requirements,” the new policy reads. 

    Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

  • O’Leary defends his TikTok offer now competing against MrBeast as ‘only’ viable option

    O’Leary defends his TikTok offer now competing against MrBeast as ‘only’ viable option

    As the internet’s top creator MrBeast allegedly readies to enter the TikTok sale arena, “Mr. Wonderful” is defending his deal as the best and most viable option for the Chinese-owned social platform.

    “The most, not troubling, but difficult part of this is in the fifth and sixth page of that order two Fridays ago from the Supreme Court, it specifically outlines: not a single line of code can be used from the existing Chinese algorithm. That’s 5 billion codes nobody can use,” Kevin O’Leary explained on “Varney & Co.,” Thursday.

    “So now it comes back to which group — I don’t care how many people announced this — has the tech to support this. And as far as I know, it’s only the McCourt-O’Leary bid. We have the tech.”

    O’Leary and billionaire entrepreneur Frank McCourt have put out a $20 billion cash offer to TikTok to purchase the app after the Supreme Court upheld Congress’ federal law requiring the company to divest to a U.S. buyer or face a user ban.

    KEVIN O’LEARY WARNS TIKTOK’S FATE COULD BE DETERMINED BY ‘SECRET GOLDEN SHARE’ GRANTING BEIJING ‘VETO’ POWER

    The Associated Press reported that, on Tuesday, a law firm advising Recruiter.com Ventures founder and CEO Jesse Tinsley’s TikTok offer named Jimmy Donaldson – better known as MrBeast – as an interested party in the deal.

    Kevin O’Leary says his TikTok offer is the “only” viable option as mega-popular internet creator MrBeast reportedly enters the race, too. (FOXBusiness)

    Adding to speculation, Donaldson had posted on X on Jan. 13 that he’d “buy TikTok so it doesn’t get banned,” adding the next day that “I’ve had so many billionaires reach out to me since I tweeted this, let’s see if we can pull this off.”

    But a representative for Donaldson confirmed to the Associated Press Wednesday that MrBeast hasn’t officially joined any bids, saying: “Several buyers are holding ongoing discussions with Jimmy… He has no exclusive agreements with any of them.”

    “The only two that can decide what’s going to happen here are [President Donald] Trump and Xi [Jinping]. And so Xi has not yet indicated if he wants to sell it, that’s the next step,” O’Leary expanded. “If he does, everybody’s happy with whatever Trump comes back with as long as it complies with the laws of Congress and the order from the Supreme Court.”

    GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

    “We’ve been to the Hill this week talking to senators and congressmen about what we’ve got,” Mr. Wonderful added. “We can move it over without a single line of Chinese code and allow Americans to sequester their own data so there’s no leakage. And I’m hoping that’s, [at] the end of the day, why this deal comes to us.”

    Though TikTok’s future operation and ownership remains uncertain, President Trump signed an executive order on his first day in the Oval Office that extends its divest-or-ban deadline by 75 days, giving the Chinese social media app more time to decide on a buyer.

    READ MORE FROM FOX BUSINESS